![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival #24The Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival is published twice each month. We find useful recent personal finance, investing and economics blog posts and articles to share with you.
Visa Infinite Card: USA vs. InternationalI’ve received quite a few questions about the Visa Infinite credit card so I thought it was time to explain what’s fact and what’s fiction. What is it? So what is Visa Infinite? Well as you know, Visa issues cards in different tiers. While most of us know the Classic, Gold, and Platinum levels. On [...] USA Spends $7,960 Compared to Around $3,800 for Other Rich Countries on Health Care with No Better Health ResultsThe latest data from the commonwealth fund report confirms the status quo. The USA spends twice as much on their health care system for no better results. It is easier to argue the USA is below average in performance that leading. And for double the cost that is inexcusable. Globally the rich countries citizens are not tremendously happy with health care systems overall. It seems likely not only does the USA cost twice and much as it should and perform poorly compared to countries doing an excellent job but the USA performs that poorly compared to countries that themselves have quite a bit of improvement to make. Which makes the state of the USA system even worse. Data from the Commonwealth fund report published in 2011 with data for 2009, International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2011: Table showing, percent of GDP spent and total spending per capita in USD on health care by country.
Under currently law in the USA by 2020 the uninsured rate should decline to under 5% by 2020 (still far more than any rich country – nearly all of which are at 0%). On many performance measures in the report the USA is the worst performing system (in addition to costing twice as much). Such as Avoidable Deaths, 2006–07, the USA had 96 per 100,000, the next highest was the UK at 83, Australia was the lowest at 57. And Diabetes Lower Extremity Amputation Rates per 100,000 population, the USA had 36 the next highest was New Zealand at 12, the lowest was the UK at 9. For experiencing a medical, medication or lab test rrror in past 2 years, the USA was at 18%, next worst was Canada at 17%, best was UK at 8%. The USA was top performer in breast cancer five-year survival rate, 2002–2007. And sometimes the USA was in the middle, able to get same/next day appointment when sick: the USA was at 57%, New Zealand achieved 78% while Canada only reached 45%. It is possible to argue the USA provides mediocre results, which is consistent with most global health care performance measures. Unless you directly benefit from the current USA system it is hard to see how you can argue it is not the worst system of any rich country. Costing twice as much and achieving middling performance. All that doesn’t even factor in the cost in anguish and bankruptcies and restricting individual freedom (when you have to stay tied to a job you would rather leave, just because of health insurance) caused by the difficulty getting coverage and fighting with the insurance companies for payment and coverage for treatment expenses. Related: Measuring the Health of Nations – USA Paying More for Health Care – Traveling for Health Care – resources for improvement health system performance PNC Secured Credit Card: Available In 2012 or Not?Q: I am 5 months post-bankruptcy and want to get my credit back on track. Can you tell me why the PNC Bank credit card application is not available on their website, at least from what I see? Do I need to apply in-person for it? A: I didn’t see it up there either, but [...] Apple’s Impossibly Good QuarterApple has been performing amazingly well for years. They keep producing blockbuster hits over and over. Not only are these hits enormously popular they are enormously profitable. The only real objections to Apple’s stock I can see are: the overall market value is so huge it just has to collapse (over $ 400 billion – the largest in the world) or it has to be time for a huge reversal of fortunes. The problem with the view that it will fall is that the stock is very cheap by any rational measure. You are not paying much for all the earnings. Even if Apple does not continue the trend of the last 5 years, if it just stopped growing altogether, it is still cheap (if it does continue that trend it will break $ 1 trillion by 2014 – but I don’t think it will). The biggest risk is the profit margin shrinks drastically. That is possible. It is even somewhat likely to shrink a fair amount. But there isn’t much reason to think revenues will not grow. And to me, the current price makes sense only if revenues fall and profit margins fall. It takes the worst case scenario to make this stock seem overpriced. The data on the last quarter (and for 2011 overall) are impossible (except they actually happened).
You can’t grow quarterly sales from $ 26.7 billion to $ 46.3 billion. $ 26 million to $ 46 million, fine that is possible, billions however – not possible. Except Apple did. You can’t grow a $ 6 billion quarterly profit to $ 13 billion in 1 year. Except Apple did. You can’t generate a cash flow of $ 17.5 billion in a quarter. Except Apple did. You can’t have a stockpile of $ 100 billion in cash. Except Apple does. These figure would not have been seen as unlikely just 3 years ago. They were impossible. But Apple achieved them. These figures are not short term blips. They are the latest in a long stream of amazingly results. Related: How Apple Can Grow from $ 200 Billion to $ 300 Billion In Market Cap – Apple Tops Google (August 2008) Apple has numerous, incredibly strong businesses. Each could be the linchpin of an extremely valuable company.
Potentially huge business: Apple TV and ebook sales. It is hard to see how they could have serious stumbles in numerous of these extremely profitable businesses all at the same time. Some more interesting figures:
I do strongly believe Apple should pay a sizable regular dividend (at least 1.5%). But I don’t know if the odds are great that they will. One risk is they blow the money in foolish ways. When you $ 100 billion and generate over $ 3 billion more each month it is hard to appreciate that risking a few billion here and a few billion there really matters. For each business there is risk and certainly possibilities of slower growth, decline and profit margin contraction. The stock is priced for quite a bit of earnings decline. And has been for awhile. I understand the reluctance to buy a company that has a market cap over $ 400 billion. But when you look at the finances and contemplate the future it is hard to see how the stock is not cheap. There are risks. There are risks with every stock and risks to the future profitability of every company. Having so many extremely strong, extremely profitable business puts Apple in a great position. It is hard to see how they can come up with another business line that can make a difference to the profits of a $ 400 billion company. But the stock price isn’t expecting that. It isn’t expecting growth in revenue. It isn’t expecting growth in profits. From where I sit the potential for Apple from the current price (PE of 13) is much greater than the risk. And even with a 8% increase today is cheaper than yesterday (the news is so impossibly great that 8% doesn’t capture the value of that news). I own Apple stock, but not enough. My sleepwell portfolio includes Apple stock. I was smart enough to finally buy it after waiting for years thinking the price wasn’t good enough. Related: Intel Reports Their Best Quarter Ever (July 2010) – Google up 13% on Great Earnings Announcement – Amazon Soars on Good Earnings and Projected Sales – Leadership quotes from Steve Jobs 730 Credit Score Is Good, But Not Excellent In 2012Is 730 a good credit score? Yes but it’s not “excellent” as many of the self-proclaimed “leading” credit card websites claim. Sorry to burst your bubble, but if you have a 730 credit score you are not in the “excellent” category like this top ranking credit card site claims: In fact, I can’t remember any [...] Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival #23Welcome to the Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival: find useful recent personal finance, investing and economics blog posts and articles. The carnival is published twice each month. This carnival is different than others in two significant ways. First, I select posts from the blogs I read (instead of just posting those that submit to the carnival). I think this provides readers a better selection of valuable material (many of the best blogs don’t take time to submit to carnivals). And second, I include articles when I think they are interesting. I figure the primary purpose is to provide links to good recent content, so just because something isn’t a blog post doesn’t exclude it from inclusion.
If you would like to be considered for guest hosting a future edition of the carnival please make a comment including a link to your blog. I will be selective in what blogs I have guest host. My management blog has been hosting a carnival for years now. Related: 2011 annual management blog roundup Merchants Tire Credit Card: Is It Worth The Hassle?A couple years ago on the forum, there was a man who had a Merchant’s Tire credit card account. Even though he lived in Virginia, his soon to be ex-wife allegedly raked up $ 1,500 in charges on his account in a totally different state, Florida. How did that happen? Well according to him, she allegedly [...] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




